Presentation Speech by Professor H.G. Söderbaum, Secretary of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, on December 10, 1928*
Your Majesty, Your Royal Highnesses, Ladies
and Gentlemen.
We hear continually that today science, in particular natural
science, is becoming increasingly more specialized, that
scientists are delving deeper and deeper into specialized studies
difficult to survey, that the deep stream of research is turning
into ever-shallower brooks and channels, and that in this way the
unity that exists between the different branches of science is in
danger of being destroyed. Indeed, most people have wondered with
some disquiet where this apparently unrestricted specialization
will eventually lead. The answer to this question is that, while
the question itself is completely justified, the disquiet is in
most cases unjustified or at least unduly great.
A stage is reached sooner or later in the development of every
natural science, when research, after dealing with problems of
more general importance, has of necessity to apply itself to
problems of detail of apparently more limited interest. It is
simply that the continuous increase in scientific knowledge
necessitates a corresponding continuous increase in the division
of work. Many fields of science which could once be handled by a
few or even one investigator, may only one generation later
provide enough or more than enough work for whole hosts of
students and their attendants. However, specialization is, or
should be, not an end but a means. Even at the stage of the
division of work, for the true investigator the end is, and will
remain, that of determining the inner connection between the
changing phenomena, and, depending on the extent to which this
end is achieved, the special researches will gradually merge into
greater units; the detail then ceases to be an isolated thing,
more or less unimportant as regards the whole, but becomes a
necessary link in a connected chain of knowledge.
The work which has been awarded Alfred Nobel's Chemistry Prizes
this year by the Academy of Sciences, provides an instructive
example of this process.
We are dealing here with several fields of work, which are
separate from the start.
First we have biles. As is well-known, biles and hence their
specific constituents, bile acids, are of major importance in the
digestion process. Now these bile acids have been for almost a
hundred years the object of active study by a large number of
prominent investigators. In this way a large amount of material
was accumulated from observations, but despite this, little was
known concerning the connection between the various bile acids,
and almost nothing concerning the details of their structure,
when Wieland began his work in this field.
Then we have the cardiac poisons. Of animal cardiac poisons
chemists were acquainted in particular with so-called bufotalin,
which is present in the skin secretion of certain species of the
toad genus Bufo. In therapeutics, on the other hand,
vegetable cardiac poisons have long been used, especially those
belonging to the glucoside group and obtained from species of the
plant genera Digitalis and Strophantus. But the production of
these substances in the pure state and the determination of the
chemical relationships between them had long remained an
unresolved problem.
The so-called sterols are also an extremely interesting group
from the physiological viewpoint. They too occur both in
vegetation and in animals. Most numerous are the vegetable
sterols, the so-called phytosterols, but the best-known is
certainly cholesterol, which occurs in the animal organism, and
which was first found about 150 years ago in gall stones. This
substance occurs not only in bile but also in the brain, in nerve
substance, in the egg, in blood, and presumably in all cells.
Thus we can conclude that it plays an extremely important part in
the life process of man and the animals, just as the phytosterols
play an extremely important part in the life process of plants.
These sterols were however an isolated group for a long time. The
difficulties associated with investigation of their chemical
constitution were so great that it is only during the last few
decades, above all through Windaus's investigations, that a
clearer picture has been obtained thereof.
Finally, we come to a group of compounds which have only been
known for a relatively short time, but which during this short
time have attracted very considerable attention, both from
chemists and from the public at large. Who today is unacquainted
with vitamins, these mysterious substances which are of such
immense significance for life, vita, itself and which have
thus justifiably taken their name from it? But compared with
those mentioned above, the difficulties which here confronted the
investigator were far greater, and in most cases it had to be
regarded as sufficient to characterize these substances on the
basis of their physiological effects.
Thanks to the work which this year has been found before others
worthy of recognition through the award of the Nobel Prize in
Chemistry, the inner connection between all these apparently
isolated fields of research has been very strikingly
demonstrated. Of course the way in which this took place can only
be described very briefly here.
Wieland succeeded in producing from bile a saturated acid which
can be regarded as the mother substance or parent acid of the
bile acids, and which he studied and characterized in detail.
When Windaus then produced this same parent acid, cholanic acid,
from cholesterol by means of a complicated and very ingenious
series of experiments, this indicated very clearly the close
relationship between cholesterol and the bile acids. It should be
pointed out in this connection that Wieland's investigations into
bile acids themselves gave a deeper insight of the mechanism of
the action of the bile in the resorption of food in the
intestines.
But this is not all. As a result of patient and skilful work,
Windaus succeeded in producing several of the digitalis
glucosides and their components in the pure state. In this way it
was shown that these vegetable cardiac poisons are directly
related on the one hand to cholesterol and the bile acids, and on
the other hand to the animal cardiac poison bufotoxin, which
Wieland studied with great success.
Another sterol which Windaus has studied in detail, is
ergosterol, which occurs partly in ergot and partly in yeast. The
research carried out in recent years, in which Windaus himself
has also played a leading part, has revealed the very important
fact that, on being irradiated with ultraviolet light, this
ergosterol assumes exactly the same properties as the
antirachitic vitamin, "vitamin D", i.e. it will cure rachitis
(rickets). For example, it has been found that 5 mg of irradiated
ergosterol has the same action in this respect as 1 litre of good
cod-liver oil. It can be considered proved, therefore, that
ergosterol, or possibly a sterol, the physiological effects of
which correspond completely with those of ergosterol, constitutes
the antirachitic provitamin, i.e. the mother substance of vitamin
D.
All the investigations which we have had to summarize so briefly
here, have one thing in common with each other. They were all
designed to explain the internal structure of organic materials,
their relationships with one another and their transitions into
each other. For this reason they are of fundamental importance
for our knowledge of a number of processes occurring both in the
healthy and in the diseased organism, and therefore of greatest
significance not only for chemistry as such, but also for its
sister sciences, physiology and medicine. But in order to reach
this vantage point of knowledge, where the dividing walls
separating the various special researches no longer obstruct
vision, where the connection between extensive parts of organic
chemistry can be surveyed and where in fact the fields of three
main disciplines appear to connect and merge with each other -
all this has taken years of hard, diligent, and resourceful work
in the deep mines of detailed research. These are the researches
which are to be rewarded here.
Professor Wieland. The decision of the
Royal Academy of Sciences to award you the Nobel Prize in
Chemistry for your work on bile acids and related substances, is
only a just recognition of the solution of a problem which is
without doubt one of the most difficult which organic chemistry
has had to tackle.
The complex composition of the compounds investigated, the large
number of atoms contained in the molecules of these compounds,
the fact that the material was often very difficult to produce,
even in small quantities, these were obstacles which could only
be overcome with such striking success through a remarkable skill
in experimentation and a rare capacity for finding new ways and
means.
In gratitude for what you have achieved for science in this
connection, and with hearty congratulations on your well-deserved
distinction, the Academy asks you to accept the Nobel Prize in
Chemistry for the year 1927 from the hands of his Majesty the
King.
Professor Windaus. If the Royal Academy of
Sciences had had only one Nobel Prize in Chemistry to award on
this occasion, and had had to present it to one person, it would
have been in a very difficult position.
For there is no doubt that your work on sterols, vegetable
cardiac poisons and other closely related substances merits in
the same high degree such an award as the work which we have just
recognized.
Moreover, it is clear that your work and that of your colleague
in Munich are so interrelated and supplement each other in such a
way that it would have been extremely difficult to award the
Prize to the one while passing over the other.
In addition, both researches display the same assiduity, the same
remarkable capacity for overcoming even the greatest experimental
difficulties, and the same lucidity in interpreting the results
obtained, that it would obviously have been impossible to give
precedence to one investigator over the other.
The fact that two Prizes were available for award this year, has
fortunately freed the Academy from this quandary. For this the
Academy congratulates itself no less than you, and asks you now
to take the last few steps which separate you from the external
symbols of the Prize.
From Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1922-1941, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1966
* The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1927 was announced on November 13, 1928.
Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1927