![]() |
Swedish Academy The Permanent Secretary |
Press Release
This year's winner of the Nobel Prize in
Literature made his debut in 1949. A selective bibliography from
January 1972 on works by, and about, Heinrich Böll
lists some forty volumes from his own hand, disregarding reprints
and new editions. Last in line comes his most grandly conceived
work - and that not only in size - the novel published last year,
Gruppenbild mit Dame. This teeming production has proved
an attractive spoil for commentators - few contemporary writers
have been scrutinized from so many angles and so methodically as
Heinrich Böll. It need hardly be said that opinions differ
not so much over his position in modern German literature as, in
particular, over where to find the lasting characteristics of his
writing and whither its lines of development lead. The reason for
this lies perhaps in Böll's method. Every time one or two
new works have been completed he has altered his approach and
changed his viewpoint. The constant stream of his writings is
full of surprises.
It is not, however, chiefly this capacity for continuous
variation that is meant when the Swedish
Academy, in motivating this year's award, states that
Böll's writing has contributed to a renewal of German
literature. Nor is this a reference to the type of literary
innovation by which old forms are abandoned in a search for
untried means of expression. Böll has seldom moved any
distance from the established landmarks of realistic narrative.
He has shown less aptitude and interest in experiments with form
than many another writer who is leaving his mark on modern
literature in Germany and elsewhere.
Yet he has declared "Ich brauche wenig Wirklichkeit", a word to
note, coming from one who is regarded, and who, perhaps, regards
himself as a realistic narrator. The reality he needs so little
is that of the classic 19th century novel, the reality that,
after a meticulous study of detail, is faithfully reproduced.
Böll is highly proficient at the method but employs it
ironically; there is no moderation in the superfluity of detail
and the comedy may erupt into a feat of endurance, at times even
for a reader without his stamina.
But the jesting with this conscientious form of registration is
itself a demonstration of how little Böll needs such a
reality. His mastery includes the ability to bring his setting
and its figures to life with scanty, sometimes barely suggested,
lines.
But there is another reality which Böll's writing
continually requires: the background to his existence, the air
his generation breathed, the heritage into which it came. That
reality is the recurrent, intrusively observed subject of
Heinrich Böll's writing, from the start up to the magnum
opus already mentioned, Gruppenbild mit Dame, which so far
crowns his work. Böll's real breakthrough came in the years
1953, 1954, and 1955, with three novels published one after the
other - Und sagte kein einziges Wort; Haus ohne
Hüter; and Das Brot der frühen Jahre.
Although it was presumably not the author's intention, these
three titles serve to indicate the reality which he so
persistently and forcefully depicts. His background was Germany's
years of famine, it was"das Brot der frühen Jahre", the
bread that never sufficed, and often was not there, the bread
that had to be begged for, or stolen, if one was to survive, and
that diet is an indelible memory. The heritage which he and his
contemporaries had to administer was Haus ohne Hüter,
"house without caretaker", an existence in ruins, with time, a
widow, and the future, fatherless. The air he and his
contemporaries breathed was inhaled with the heavy hand of
dictatorship on their throats, und sagte kein einziges
Wort, because the hand smothered every sound.
It is not the smallest German miracle that after such years of
destitution a new generation of writers, thinkers and researchers
was ready so soon to shoulder their country's and their own
essential task in the spiritual life of our time. The renewal of
German literature, to which Heinrich Böll's achievements
witness, and of which they are a significant part, is not an
experiment with form - a drowning man scorns the butterfly
stroke. Instead it is a rebirth out of annihilation, a
resurrection, a culture which, ravaged by icy nights and
condemned to extinction, sends up new shoots, blossoms, and
matures to the joy and benefit of us all. Such was the kind of
work Alfred Nobel wished his Prize to reward.