Presentation Speech by Professor the Count K.A.H. Mörner, Rector of the Royal Caroline Institute, on December 10, 1908
Your Majesty, Your Royal Highnesses, Ladies
and Gentlemen.
Some time ago in this place a short description was given of the
development of medicine. In it it was emphasized that medical
science today has set itself the task of attempting to prevent
disease. In order to achieve this aim one must attempt, on the
one hand to find the disease germ and destroy it, and on the
other hand to give the body the strength to resist attack. As
regards the latter, the possibility of obtaining protection
against certain diseases has long been known, for the observation
has been made that in many cases organisms which have gone
through an infectious disease will acquire protection against
being attacked by the same disease again. We then say that the
organism has acquired immunity against the disease in
question.
In scientific development, however, there is a very big step
between this observation and a real knowledge of the changes
which have taken place in the organism through immunization, and
it is also a very big step from the same observation to the
ability, consciously and without the danger attendant upon the
course of the illness, to give the organism such powers of
resistance. It was, therefore, rightly considered to be an
epoch-making and blessed moment in the history of medicine when
Edward Jenner introduced, more than a hundred years ago,
protective vaccination with cow-pox substance which can give
immunity against a disease, namely smallpox, the ravages of which
the present generation can hardly imagine. Great though the
practical importance of Jenner's discovery was, it did not
advance the development of the study of immunity in respect of
other diseases or permit of any deep penetration into the problem
of immunity generally. The prerequisites for a successful
scientific elaboration of the study of immunity were still
missing. The first and most important condition for making the
problem of immunity the subject of real scientific research was
namely to establish the cause of disease. It was the
revolutionary work of Pasteur and Koch which was done during approximately
three quarters of a century after Jenner's discovery which laid
the necessary foundation for the present important development of
the study of immunity. Elie Metchnikoff was the first to take up
consciously and purposefully, by means of experiments, the study
of the question so fundamental to the question of immunity; by
what means does the organism vanquish the disease-bearing
microbes attacking the organism in which they have succeeded in
establishing themselves and developing? At first his experiments
were restricted to the lower animals. This was the case in his
important work concerning a kind of infection in certain
microscopic aquatic animals, the so-called water fleas. If the
guiding principles behind these investigations were not known
they could appear to be remote from any medical interest. They
were, however, the first links in a chain of investigations
leading to phenomena of immunity, also in mammals and in humans.
These investigations opened the way for Metchnikoff's theory of
phagocytosis. According to this theory, the microorganisms are
destroyed by the activity of cells in the organism. Certain kinds
of cells in the bodies of humans and animals, namely, are
supposed to have, in addition to other functions, the task of
catching and destroying disease-producing microbes which have
succeeded in penetrating the organism, and also of rendering
certain bacterial poisons harmless.
I cannot here give a report on the comprehensive work and
valuable observations which go to make up this theory of
phagocytosis. But an important aspect of this research is that it
makes a special study of certain types of cells, and that first
of all the importance of the cells for the phenomena of immunity
is emphasized. One can safely predict that even if other features
are of more immediate importance in this doctrine, nevertheless
the abundant actual observations which have been made with regard
to the importance of the cells to the problem of immunity will
always remain of great and permanent value. In the doctrine of
immunity, as in other provinces of biology, the activity of the
cells, which are considered as being the focus of organic life,
remains a factor of the highest importance. The research of
recent years into the question of immunity has thrown the
importance of Metchnikoff's work into strong relief. As a
recognition of Metchnikoff's accomplishment in initiating modern
research into the question of immunity, the direction and
development of which, particularly in its early stages, he
profoundly influenced, the Caroline Institute wishes to honour
him with this year's Nobel Prize.
Like other biological processes, the phenomena of immunity are of
a very complicated nature and provide a field of research of
almost unlimited extent. It is obvious, therefore, that this
field can be approached from various directions. Recently other
comprehensive and equally successful research into immunity has
been conducted, only certain parts of which touch upon the theory
of phagocytosis. I will attempt to explain this in a few
words.
It has been shown that protection against disease can be of two
kinds. It can consist in the ability to destroy microbes or to
inhibit their further development. This is a bacteria-destroying
immunity. But there is also a protection of another kind, one
which acts against the bacteria products. The damage which the
disease-producing microorganisms cause, namely, is conditioned by
the poisons which these organisms produce and which are
distributed by the body fluids. A certain kind of immunity occurs
against this danger as well, namely the so-called poison
immunity. The best known example of this is the use of
anti-diphtheria serum, when, through serum injection, substances
are introduced into the organism which act as antitoxins against
the diphtheria poison. It has been discovered that poisons which
are produced by bacteria have the property, as have many other
substances also, of causing the production of elements in the
organism which have an antagonistic effect especially and
exclusively directed against the substance which caused the
production of the elements. This we call the formation of
antibodies. After immunity has been achieved, such antibodies are
found in the humors of the organism. Furthermore, it has been
possible to show that these antibodies are of great importance,
not only as regards protection against disease-producing
microorganisms themselves, but also, above all, as regards
protection against the toxic products of these organisms.
An endless series of questions now arises: Why are antibodies
only built up against some substances and not against all
substances which are foreign to the organism? Where are the
antibodies formed? By what process are they formed? What is the
nature and constitution of these antibodies? How do they react on
the microorganisms and their poisons? And various other questions
which are important as regards the development and practical
utilization of the theory of immunity. It is also a matter of
great interest that connecting links have been found between the
theory of immunity and the normal physiological processes.
A great deal of intensive and very fruitful work has been devoted
to these questions in the last one and a half decades. A large
number of research scientists have served the cause of science
well by their discoveries and achievements. It is not possible
here to report on the extent to which the questions have been
answered, neither is it possible to describe the separate
accomplishments of individual scientists in this field.
A man who has been responsible for important scientific progress
as organizer and leader in this field deserves to be mentioned
among the first of those who have dedicated themselves to a study
of immunity, is the research scientist Paul Ehrlich, already
famous for his other biological work, and the Professorial Staff
of the Caroline Institute wishes to honour him too with this
year's Nobel Prize for his work in the sphere of immunity.
The Professorial Staff of the Caroline Institute has, therefore,
decided to award the Nobel Prize this year to Elie Metchnikoff
and to Paul Ehrlich for their work on the theory of immunity.
From Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine 1901-1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1967
Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1908