Presentation Speech by Professor T. Caspersson, member of the Staff of Professors of the Royal Caroline Institute
Your Majesty, Royal Highnesses, Ladies and
Gentlemen.
That children resemble their parents, that striking features in
both domestic animals and cultivated plants are transmitted from
one generation to another, or in short, the circumstance that
characteristics descend from generation to generation, has
attracted interest during all periods in human history and has
stimulated the inquiring spirit which is the origin of all
organized knowledge. Innumerable attempts to explain such
transmission have been made during the course of time. The manner
of attacking the problem in our own time by empirical and
experimental methods has led to the development of the modern
theory of heredity. This is a relatively young science. The year
1946 marks an anniversary, for it is now exactly 80 years since
Gregor
Mendel published his first experimental studies, in the
course of which he found that characteristics were passed down
independently from parent individuals, and combined themselves
freely in daughter individuals. These observations may be said to
constitute the initiation of modern heredity research. In 1866,
however, the time was hardly ripe for further development, and it
was not before the turn of the century that the importance of
Mendel's work was realized.
During the intervening period much has happened within the sphere
of the biological sciences. The conception that all living beings
are built up of similar bricks, the cells, had been fortified,
and the main features of the general structure of the cells of
both plants and animals were known. Above all, the intricate
processes which are reflected in the cell division had been
analysed and been shown to imply that, at every cell fission,
certain parts of the cell nucleus, the so-called chromosomes,
were divided up with great exactitude and distributed exactly
equally over the daughter cells. Further, the mechanism of
fertilization had been elucidated - how two cells, one from each
parent organism, fused together into the fertilized egg cell.
From the latter is subsequently developed the definitive organism
in which different properties, characteristic of the parent
organisms, recur.
If characteristics of different kinds are to pass from generation
to generation, they must all, of course, be found represented in
some way in this fertilized egg cell or - as it can also be
expressed - this cell must contain certain factors which
condition the development of different properties when the
daughter organism is formed. These so-called hereditary factors,
or to use a more convenient name, genes, had, and perhaps still
have, something of a mystic shimmer over them. They not only
affect, but they guide and determine the development of the whole
organism, even that of man. As the total number of all the
characteristics which distinguish, for example, one species of
animal from another is extremely large, the number of genes must
also be very large. In spite of this, they must all find a place
within the microscopically small individual cell.
As early as during the first years of this century, the opinion
was advanced that the chromosomes were the bearers of the genes,
and that the care with which Nature arranges that at cell
division the chromosome substance is distributed exactly equally
over the daughter cells in reality aims at guaranteeing that the
supply of genes in the daughter cells shall be like that of the
mother cells, and the daughter organisms like the parent
organisms. At that time, however, ideas were vague and
hypothetical, and the gene was a philosophical idea rather than a
tangible reality for empirical research.
In about 1910, however, a group of research workers, with
Morgan, Muller, Bridges, and
Sturtevant as the central force and Morgan as the leader, started
a series of operations which created a fresh foundation for
heredity research. Morgan's contribution was rewarded with the
Nobel Prize in 1933.
The works of this group of men gradually led, among other things,
to the «materialization» of the gene - if I may be
permitted to employ the expression - the conception lost most of
its mystic shimmer, and the gene was now apprehended as a little
cell organella which was accessible thanks to different
experimental methods, perhaps a giant molecule of protein
character, and, as Muller had first suggested, probably
resembling the simpler types of virus which have been dealt with
earlier this evening.
The gene conception is of importance, from the point of view of
principle, for fundamental biological problems of the most varied
kinds. Different plants and different species of animals differ
in their different characteristics, the sum total of which
characterizes the individual species. Behind them lie the
conditioning and cooperating genes, and it is more than a paradox
to say that that which constitutes the essentials in the
individual species of plant or animal is less the developed
organism than the set-up of genes met with in the different parts
of the cells. In all increase of the living substance the primary
process is an increase in the substance of the genes which is to
be carried on to the daughter individuals, to shape them into
counterparts of the parent individuals. The development from
lower to higher organism, which is the basis of the modern theory
of development, involves - apart from the reproduction of the
genes in the propagation of the species - also a progressive
series of changes in the stock of genes.
It is manifest that the study of the structure of the gene and of
the possibilities which may conceivably exist of effecting its
reproduction artificially, the fundamental vital process, or even
artificially modifying it and thereby changing the organism, must
present itself as a fascinating sphere of work. After some years
Muller left the Morgan group and devoted his labours entirely to
this sphere; in the first place to the tempting, but difficult,
task of finding methods of changing the heredity factors
artificially.
It was known, already at the turn of the century, that apparently
sudden changes may appear spontaneously in the hereditary mass,
which result in changes in the characteristics of the organism.
We now know that these changes may be of different types, and
among them occur also disturbances in individual genes. These are
very rare, however. Even in such a convenient experimental object
as the banana fly, introduced by Morgan, where the generations
succeed each other rapidly, and thousands of flies can be
examined, it is only seldom that mutations are observed. Muller
grappled with the task of trying to change the frequency of
mutations. He first created procedures, technically extremely
elegant, by which the mutation frequency could be measured
exactly. When this task - which took several years - had been
completed, the effect of different agents on the frequency of
mutations was investigated, and the discovery for which the Nobel
Prize is now awarded was made, viz. that irradiation with X-rays
evokes large numbers of mutations. Experiments could be arranged,
for instance, so that nearly 100 per cent of the offspring of
irradiated flies showed mutations. Thus a possibility had been
created for the first time of influencing the hereditary mass
itself artificially.
This discovery aroused a great sensation already when it was
first published in 1927 and rapidly led to a great deal of work
of different kinds and in the most varied directions. The
mechanism of the effect of rays was studied by many research
workers, with Muller at their head. Greatly simplified X-ray
irradiation, as also ionizing irradiation, could be likened in
general to a shower of infinitely small (even compared with the
individual cell) but highly explosive grenades, which explode at
different spots within the irradiated organism. The explosion
itself (or the fragments it throws up) tears the structure of the
cell to pieces or disturbs its arrangement. If such an explosion
happens to take place in or close to a gene, its structure, and
therewith also its effect on the organism, may be changed.
Muller's discovery of the induction of mutations by means of rays
has been of tremendous importance for genetics and biology in
general.
The foremost instrument of experimental genetics is just the
mutations of genes. Thus the whole teaching structure of the
Morgan school is based on the utilization of certain spontaneous
mutations. Now, when Muller has created a means of simply
producing in every laboratory an unlimited number of these
otherwise so rare phenomena, it is obvious that genetic research
in general must be greatly stimulated thereby. The effect of
irradiation is absolutely universal, mutations appear after
irradiation within all organisms, from simple viruses and
bacteria up to the most highly organized plants and mammals. One
of the principal causes of the amazingly rapid development which
genetics has undergone during the last two decades is the
realization of these technical possibilities.
For the fundamental question, the problem of the mechanism of the
reproduction of genes and the basis of the mutation processes,
Muller's discovery has created new lines of research which
impinge on different branches of science. Muller himself has been
indefatigable within this field and has, himself and through his
pupils, led the development.
The extended knowledge of the mechanism of the mutation processes
has influenced and stimulated the work in numerous fields outside
theoretical genetics, and both theoretically and practically
important results have been reached. Merely to exemplify the
diversity and the varied nature of the spheres touched upon, I
beg to adduce a few examples: applied genetics, especially plant
improvement, which is of such practical importance, the theory of
evolution, metabolic research, a number of spheres within the
realm of medicine, especially perhaps eugenics and the theory of
disease in general.
Just this multiplicity of spheres which are affected by Muller's
discovery indicates its fundamental character. It is already one
of the most important foundation-stones of the complex structure
of modern biology, and Mendel, Morgan, and Muller together will
always stand out as the creators of the modern science of
heredity.
Muller's contribution to its development extends far beyond the
discovery for which the prize is now awarded. For more than three
decades he has been in the front rank as regards both the
scientific work and the eager but inspiring discussions of the
results within the field, and these are the most important
incitement to future development. He is now more active than
ever, and, as the donator wished, the Nobel Prize can now be
awarded to a man at the height of his scientific creative
power.
Doctor Hermann Muller. In recognition of your outstanding contributions to Science, the Royal Caroline Institute has awarded you this year's Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. On behalf of the Institute I wish to extend warm congratulations from your colleagues on your brilliant achievements, and I now ask you to receive your award from the hands of His Majesty the King.
From Nobel Lectures, Physiology or Medicine 1942-1962, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1964
Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1946