![]() |
NOBELFÖRSAMLINGEN KAROLINSKA INSTITUTET
THE NOBEL ASSEMBLY AT THE KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE
9 October 1989
The
Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute has today
decided to award the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
for 1989 jointly to
J. Michael Bishop and Harold E. Varmus
for their discovery of "the cellular origin of retroviral
oncogenes".
The discovery awarded with this year's Nobel Prize in
Physiology or Medicine concerns the identification of a
large family of genes which control the normal growth and
division of cells. Disturbances in one or some of these
so-called oncogenes (Gk ónco(s) bulk, mass) can
lead to transformation of a normal cell into a tumor cell
and result in cancer.
Michael Bishop and Harold Varmus used an
oncogenic retrovirus to identify the growth-controlling
oncogenes in normal cells. In 1976 they published the
remarkable conclusion that the oncogene in the virus did
not represent a true viral gene but instead was a normal
cellular gene, which the virus had acquired during
replication in the host cell and thereafter carried
along.
Bishop's and Varmus' discovery of the cellular origin of
retroviral oncogenes has had an extensive influence on the
development of our knowledge about mechanisms for tumor
development. Until now more than 40 different oncogenes
have been demonstrated. The discovery has also widened our
insight into the complicated signal systems which govern
the normal growth of cells.
The term oncogene was introduced in the middle of the 1960s
to denote special parts of the genetic material of certain
viruses. It was believed that this part of the genetic
material could direct the transformation of a normal cell
into a tumor cell under the influence of other parts of the
viral genetic material, alternatively via chemical or
physical effects. The favourite theory of the time was that
virus-mediated cell-to-cell transmittance of oncogenes was
the origin of all forms of cancer. This view was later
proven to be incorrect.
The original discovery of an oncogenic virus was made in
1916 by Peyton Rous working at the Rockefeller
Institute in New York. Fifty years later Rous received the Nobel Prize
in Physiology or Medicine. Rous virus, as the infectious agent later
was named, is a member of a large virus family named
retroviruses. The genetic material of these viruses is RNA
(ribonucleic acid). This RNA can be transcribed into DNA
(deoxyribonucleic acid) by a unique enzyme in the virus,
reverse transcriptase. The 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology
or Medicine was awarded to David Baltimore, Renato Dulbecco and
Howard Temin partly for the discovery of this
enzyme.
Reverse transcription of the genetic material of the virus
into DNA has the important consequence that it can become
integrated into the chromosomal DNA in the cells. It was
through investigations of Rous virus that this year's
laureates Michael Bishop and Harold Varmus in
1975 could demonstrate the true origin of oncogenes. They
used one variant of Rous virus which contained an oncogenic
gene (Figure 1) and another variant which lacked this gene.
By use of these viruses they managed to construct a nucleic
acid probe which selectively identified the oncogene. This
probe was used to search for the corresponding genetic
material in DNA from different cells. It was then found
that oncogene-like material could be detected in different
species throughout the animal kingdom, in fact even in
simple organisms comprising only a few cells. Furthermore,
it was shown that the gene had a fixed position in the
chromosomes of a certain species, and that the gene, when
it constituted part of the cellular genetic material, was
divided into fragments (a mosaic gene) (Figure 1).
![]() |
Figure 1. The difference
between an oncogene in a virus and in a cell. In retroviruses
causing tumors there is a separate segment of transforming
nucleic acid which has been derived from a cell. The cellular
gene is split (a mosaic gene) whereas the oncogene in the
virus is continuous.
These findings led to the remarkable conclusion that the
oncogene in the virus did not represent a true viral gene but
a cellular gene which the virus had picked up far back during
its replication in cells and carried along. This cellular
gene was found to have a central function in the cells. It
controlled their growth and division.
Through these studies of the abnormal, i.e. the diseased
state, it was possible to elucidate critical normal cellular
functions - a not uncommon situation in biomedical research.
The original discovery of a cellular oncogene led to an
intensive search for further similar genes. The explosive
development of this field of research has led to the
identification of more than 40 different oncogenes which
direct different events in the complex signal systems that
regulate the growth and division of cells. Changes in any one
or more of these oncogenes may lead to cancer.
Symmetrical and asymmetrical, multicellular structures
develop from the fertilized ovum by a process of
differentiation about which only limited knowledge is
available. In the fully developed individual carefully
balanced conditions prevail. Damage of an organ elicits
sophisticated repair processes which lead to restitution of
the original condition of the organ. However, if a single
cell escapes the network of growth control the result may be
an abnormal local proliferation of cells or in the worst case
a cancer implying the dissemination of cells running
amok.
The development of a cancer is a complicated process
involving several consecutive changes of the genetic
material. Studies of cellular genes (proto-oncogenes)
corresponding to the viral oncogenes, has started to shed
light on the intricate systems which control normal cellular
growth and division.
The regulation of growth and division of cells has turned out
to be much more complicated than originally believed.
Cellular oncogene products with different properties act in
different positions of elaborate signal systems (Figure 2).
In order to transmit signals from one cell to the other or
from one cell to itself there are growth factors. These
factors appear in the fluids surrounding cells. There are
examples of oncogene products, viz. proteins produced in the
cytoplasm, which can act as growth factors. Thus, it was
found that the product of the sis1) gene was closely related to a
previously identified growth factor PDGF (Platelet Derived
Growth Factor).
![]() |
Figure 2. Oncogene products
are links in signal chains that stretch from the cell
surface to the genetic material in the cell nucleus. This
chain is composed of (1) growth factors, (2) growth factor
receptors, (3) signal transducing proteins in cell
membranes, (4) phosphokinases in the cytoplasm and (5)
proteins transported from the cytoplasm into the nucleus
where they bind to DNA. The localization of different
oncogene products (Sis, ErbB, Ras, Src, Myc) is
schematically indicated.
In order for a growth factor to be able to interact with a
cell there has to be membrane structures, receptors,
to which they can bind. There are several oncogene products
which represent receptors in the cytoplasmic membrane of
the cells, e.g. ErbA, Fms, Kit. These receptors have a
unique enzymatic activity. They are so-called kinases with
a capacity to phosphorylate (=add a phosphate group) the
amino acid tyrosine. There are two more groups of oncogene
products with phosphokinase activity; firstly
tyrosine/phosphokinase which lack receptor function and is
located at the inside of the cytoplasmic membrane, and
secondly serine/threonine phosphokinase which is found in
the cytoplasm.
Thus, oncogene products function as links in signal chains
stretching from the surface of the cell to the genetic
material in the nucleus. In the cytoplasm there is one more
group of oncogene products. These are called Ras and are
related to important cellular signal factors called
G-proteins.
Finally, there is a large number of oncogene products which
are located in the nucleus of the cell, i.e. Myc, Myb, Fos,
ErbA and others. These products direct the transcription of
DNA into RNA and therefore play a critical role in the
selection of proteins to be synthesized by the cell.
Changes in the genetic material constitute the basis for
the development of all cancer. Generally there are several
consecutive such changes which influence different steps in
the signal chains described above. Therefore, one should
à priori not expect to find one single clue to the
mechanism of origin of cancer. However, application of the
expanding knowledge in the oncogene field allows us to
start comprehending the disharmonic orchestration behind
abnormal cellular growth.
It is conceptually incorrect to speak about "cancer genes".
However, historical circumstances explain why the oncogene
terminology was introduced before a designation of the
corresponding normal cellular genes was proposed. From the
point of view of cancer the important matter is to compare
oncogenes in normal cells and in tumor cells.
The majority of oncogenes have been discovered in
experimental studies using retroviruses. However, in a few
cases oncogenes were identified by the use of an
alternative technique, i.e. genetic material was isolated
from tumor cells of non-viral origin and transferred
(transfected) to other cells prapagated in culture.
The cells receiving the DNA changed growth pattern, and
further characterization of the transfected genetic
material revealed the presence of oncogenes.
Two principally different forms of activation of oncogenes
can be distinguished. Firstly, the normal cellular oncogene
is hyperactive, and secondly the oncogene product is
altered so that it can no longer be regulated in a normal
way. There are several examples of these types of
activation of oncogenes.
The discovery of oncogenes was as mentioned originally made
by the use of retroviruses. This infers that genetic
control elements in the virus itself can be responsible for
the abnormal expression of the oncogene. However, in many
cases it was found that alterations of the transferred
oncogene contributed to its accentuated expression.
There are retroviruses which lack oncogenes but still can
induce cancer. This is due to the fact that the virus has
inserted its genetic material (in the form of DNA) very
close to a normally occurring oncogene in the genetic
material of the cell. This may result in an increased
turn-over of the oncogene which may lead to abnormal
cellular growth. The corresponding phenomenon can also
occur in the absence of retroviruses. In this case there is
a reorganization of the genetic material in the cell. Such
a reorganization may occur within a single chromosome or by
exchange of material between chromosomes. Repeated copying
of a normal oncogene can lead to its amplification
in the chromosome and consequently to increased amounts of
the oncogene product. In certain brain tumors,
glioblastomas, an amplified erbB-gene has been
found, and a correspondingly increased neu-gene
activity was shown in some forms of breast cancer.
The same effect can be seen when there is a reciprocal
exchange of segments between chromosomes
(translocation). Thus the normal myc-gene on
chromosome 8 has been translocated to chromosome 14 in many
patients with Burkitt's lymphomas (Figure 3). The insertion
of the myc-gene containing chromosome segment is
such that it becomes located close to hyperactive genes
directing the synthesis of antibody protein. As a
consequence the myc-gene becomes activated.
Chromosome translocations occur in many different tumors.
Chromosome analysis can therefore be of considerable value
for localization of genetic changes in the genome critical
for tumor development.
![]() |
Figure 3. Chromosome
translocation in Burkitt's lymphoma. Segments have been
exchanged between chromosomes 8 and 14 which has activated
the oncogene myc.
Oncogenes with point mutations have been observed in many
tumors. These mutations may cause alterations in the amino
acid composition of the gene product. A well-known example of
such a modification is the exchange of amino acid 12 from
glycine to valine in the ras gene product which has
been observed in human tumor material. The mutation may also
be somewhat more extensive leading to the absence of part of
the protein (deletion). Different examples of modified
oncogenes in human tumor material are given in Table
I.
![]() |
Cancer is not a contagious disease. However, infectious
agents like viruses can contribute to the origin of cancer.
Thus, it is by use of retroviruses that most oncogenes were
identified, the starting materials in such investigations
often being highly specialized, experimentally derived
tumors. It seems likely that retroviruses play a relatively
limited role for the development of cancer under natural
conditions. The only known example in man in which a
retrovirus infection contributes to the origin of cancer is
the HTLV-1 associated lymphomas which occur in Japan.
However, there are other kinds of viruses which can
contribute to the development of tumors in man. All these
viruses have DNA as their genetic material. As examples can
be mentioned papillome (wart) viruses and Epstein-Barr
virus, a type of herpes virus. Certain types of papillome
viruses play a role for the development of cervical cancer
in the genital tract, while Epstein-Barr virus is an
important factor for the development of Burkitt's lymphomas
in Africa and nasopharyngeal cancer in Asia. However, in
all these cases factors in addition to the virus infections
are required for the cancer to develop.
References
J.M. Bishop: Oncogenes. Scientific American, 1982,
246, 68-78.
T. Hunter: The Proteins of Oncogenes. Scientific American,
1984, 251, 60-69.
C-H. Heldin & B. Westermark: Tillväxtfaktorer och
onkgener. Läkartidningen 1988, 85,
497-499.
E. Norrby: I: Våra virus. Virus och cancer.
Allmänna Förlaget, 1987, sid. 66-74.
1) All oncogenes are identified by the use of three letter abbreviations. In addition cellular and viral oncogenes are sometimes distinguished by c- and v- prefixes, respectively, e.g. c-src and v-src.