Presentation Speech by Johan Ludwig Mowinckel*, member of the Nobel Committee, on December 10, 1930
It might appear that this year's two Peace
Prize winners are widely separated, not only in the geographical
sense by the ocean which separates their two countries, but also
in the area of their activities and in the nature of their
contributions to the cause that concerns us here. One is a man of
the world engaged in practical politics, the other a man of the
church, a soldier of the spirit.
But just as it is said that all roads lead to the Eternal City,
so it can also truthfully be claimed that many are the roads
which must be followed and many the means which must be explored
if the human race is to attain the great and sacred goal which is
eternal peace among nations.
To achieve this goal, practical efforts to promote better
collaboration in commercial and economic affairs - such as in
developing easier and faster means of communication - and similar
efforts in cultural affairs can and should go hand in hand with
purely political efforts.
But the steps that are taken and the progress which is made are
unfortunately not always readily apparent. The obstacles to be
surmounted, the opposition to be overcome, are formidable in
magnitude and number. And the problems are not just of a
practical or political character; they are frequently to be found
in the minds of men, in the warlike mentality which is so
tragically passed on from one generation to the next, a legacy
which our own generation, in spite of its fearsome experiences,
has failed to disclaim.
Alfred Nobel himself
had no illusions as to the difficulties and the complexity of
work for peace. For this reason he placed no strict limitations
on his Peace Prize; any serious and noble effort to advance the
cause of peace could qualify. At a very early date he perceived
the value of an international association of states, such as we
now have in the League of Nations. He had already formulated this
thought in January, 1893, when, in a letter to Bertha von Suttner, he outlined his
ideas for a Peace Prize which might be awarded to the person or
organization making the greatest contribution toward the
attainment of the ideal of universal peace1.
It is thus in full accord with Alfred Nobel's conception of work
for peace that no restrictions are imposed on the manner in which
it is performed. Nor can it be otherwise. For in this work, both
hand and heart are required.
How wonderful it now is to see all the world's might united in
advancing this great cause, and how happy we are that this work
can bridge not only the narrow national frontiers of our little
part of the world but also the vast expanse separating the
continents. And even if we could wish that this cooperation had
found greater support, we cannot lose sight of what has already
been accomplished: that the League of Nations, the greatest, the
most powerful, the most remarkable institution acting for peace
that the world has ever known has been established, thanks to the
initiative of the United States. The League of Nations, that
gigantic world monument which President Wilson erected in 1918 above
the ruins of war and peace2, to
the glory of his own country and for the happiness and salvation
of the world! The deepest shadow which has so far been cast over
the organization is the sad fact that Wilson's own country has
not become a member3. Fortunately
this has not meant that the United States of America has taken no
part in the great international work for peace and understanding
which has been conducted during the twelve years since the war.
Time and again the initiative and the cooperation of the U.S.A.
have left a deep and enduring mark on this work, and the pact
which bears the name of the man who sits today in our midst
exemplifies not only the efforts put forth by the U.S.A. but also
a sound and conscientious collaboration on the international
front for the advancement of peace.
The movement in favor of the «outlawry of war», to
proclaim war illegal and to label it a crime, had gained
increasing support in the U.S.A. ever since the end of the World
War. Mr. Briand, France's great
champion of peace, made a point of choosing a memorable date in
the American calendar - April 6, 1927 - the tenth anniversary of
the entry of the United States into the war, to declare himself a
disciple of that movement: «If there were any need between
these two great democracies [the United States and France] to
testify more convincingly in favor of peace and to present to the
peoples a more solemn example, France would be ready publicly to
subscribe, with the United States, to any mutual engagement
tending, as between those two countries, to ‹outlaw
war›, to use an American expression.»4
And on June 20, 1927, Briand handed to the American ambassador in
Paris a draft of a treaty of perpetual friendship between the two
countries. According to the draft, the two parties would solemnly
declare that they condemned war and renounced it as an instrument
of their national policies.
On the other side of the Atlantic, Frank B.
Kellogg, the U.S. Secretary of State, elevated this proposal
to the status of the world pact to which we pay tribute today in
the person of its author: «The Government of the United
States is prepared, therefore, to concert with the Government of
France with a view to the conclusion of a treaty among the
principal Powers of the world, open to signature by all nations,
condemning war and renouncing it as an instrument of national
policy in favor of the pacific settlement of international
disputes.»5
And from this common action emerged the pact that today binds
together almost all civilized nations in the world. Article I of
the Pact states the following: «The High Contracting Parties
solemnly declare in the names of their respective peoples that
they condemn recourse to war for the solution of international
controversies and renounce it as an instrument of national policy
in their relations with one another.»
Seldom has an inscription been as appropriate as that which the
town of Le Havre inscribed on the box holding the gold pen it
presented to Frank B. Kellogg as he stepped ashore on his way to
Paris to join France and other leading world powers in signing
the pact on August 27, 1928: Si vis pacem, para
pacem.
We fully realize that a number of countries have made significant
reservations with regard to the Kellogg Pact, and we realize,
too, that a long road remains to be traveled between the signing
of the pact and its fulfillment in spirit and in action.
We realize that theory should not be mistaken for reality.
And we also realize that the collaboration of all nations, of
which the Kellogg Pact is the great outcome, must be extended to
fields other than the purely political. For, however deep and
menacing may be the political divergences between nations, it is
not at all unlikely that differences in the field of commercial
and economic politics constitute an equally grave threat to
peace. The problem of the war debt, which still weighs heavily
upon economic progress, must be resolved finally and effectively.
And we must, in the interest of peace, try to counteract, with no
less vigor than we devote to the fight against senseless military
armament, the isolationist policies which can bring only misery
and unemployment and which obstruct the free exchange and healthy
distribution of world production.
In these domains too, cooperation between all nations is
indispensable, cooperation based on an appreciation of its
importance for the well-being of the entire world.
We shall not, however, succeed until our minds and thoughts
become attuned to peace, until our present mentality is
completely transformed. Archbishop Söderblom has said, «The
Kellogg Pact is a solemn declaration, invaluable if life is
brought into conformity with its words, delusory if actions
contradict its great and noble sentiments.» And that is the
crux of the matter: the need to animate this pact - as it has
been the need for so many other attempts to safeguard peace -
with the light of the Word, the truth of the spirit, the courage
of the will.
We must bring people to understand that it is not enough to
proclaim war to be a crime, but that it is necessary for all men
to recognize with every sense and emotion that the murder of
hundreds of thousands of human beings to settle an international
dispute is no more justifiable, no more pardonable than the
murder of a single individual to settle some personal
quarrel.
«The day», said Briand in the great speech he delivered
at the League of Nations last year, «when children are
taught to respect the people of other nations and to seek that
which unites men rather than that which divides them, then we
shall have no more need of treaties - then peace will truly reign
among nations.»6
Archbishop Nathan Söderblom's great achievement is that he
has thrown the power of the spirit into the fight for peace. A
holder of high ecclesiastical office, he understands the enormous
importance of the church in this fight, the powerful influence
which it can bring to bear. The Christian church has sinned
grievously and often against the teaching of Him whose first
commandment to men was that they should love one another. This
church surely has a unique opportunity now of creating that new
attitude of mind which is necessary if peace between nations is
to become reality.
«Peace in the heart and peace on earth make up the task of
the church, so long as it bears the name of the Prince of
Peace.»
«The spirit of Geneva». said Robert de
Traz7, «dedicated to the
salvation of mankind but seeing it only in its universal aspect,
is now seen to pervade ecclesiastical circles shattered by war.
Born of Christianity, the spirit of peace now returns to it.
Today it no longer inspires politicians, economists and lawyers
alone, it seeks to penetrate into the human mind!
If a new war threatens, the churches will not, this time, bless
the guns. They will halt the nations in the name of Him who
called Himself the Prince of Peace. At least they say this and
they commit themselves to it. And because in 1914 they denied
their Master more than twice, they now beg mankind for
forgiveness.»
In Schiller's lovely «Das Lied von der Glocke», the
church bell rings out the praise of peace in solemn tones:
Holder Friede,
süsse Eintracht,
weilet, weilet
freundlich über dieser Stadt
and it exhorts and implores:
Friede sei ihr erst Geläute!8
So today we offer our homage and our thanks
to the two great men whose work among us has set new milestones
along the road to peace among nations.
And just as all streams lead toward the sea, so we hope and
believe that the great work of the hand and of the heart for
peace, that work which bears the names of Kellogg and
Söderblom, will lead irresistibly toward making «the
spirit of Geneva» live among the people, that spirit of
which it is said that even though «still weak, disputed,
even despised, at every moment in danger of perishing - no
catastrophe can destroy it forever, for it bears mankind's
indomitable hope, that of resurrection.»
* Mr.
Mowinckel, also at this time prime minister of Norway, delivered
this speech of presentation in the auditorium of the Nobel
Institute in Oslo on December 10, 1930. The audience included Mr.
Kellogg, the recipient of the prize for 1929 (reserved in that
year), and Archbishop Söderblom, the laureate for 1930. Both
laureates responded with speeches of acceptance after receiving
the prize insignia from Mr. Fredrik Stang, chairman of the
committee. A French translation of Mr. Mowinckel's speech is
carried in Les Prix Nobel en 1930. The present translation
in English is based on the Norwegian text which appeared in the
December 10, 1930, issue of the Oslo Aftenposten.
1. Nobel's letter of January 7,
1893, from Paris to Bertha von Suttner, peace laureate for 1905,
contains this reference to a Peace Prize: «I should like to
allot part of my fortune to the formation of a prize fund to be
distributed in every period of five years (we may say six times,
for if we have failed at the end of thirty years to reform the
present system we shall inevitably revert to barbarism). This
prize would be awarded to the man or the woman who had done the
most to advance the idea of general peace in Europe.» Quoted
by Herta E. Pauli in Alfred Nobel (New York: Fischer,
1942), p. 236.
2. Thomas Woodrow Wilson
(1856-1924), U.S. president (1913-1921), primarily responsible
for the creation of the League of Nations as an integral part of
the Peace Treaty of Versailles in 1919.
3. The U.S. Senate refused to
ratify the Treaty of Versailles; therefore the U.S. never joined
the League.
4. Aristide Briand (1862-1932),
co-recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize for 1926 and French foreign
minister (1925-1932), in an open letter to the press. The
expressions «outlawry of war» and «to outlaw
war» originated with Salmon O. Levinson, an American who had
great success at the end of WWI in promulgating his ideas on
making war illegal.
5. From Kellogg's note of December
28, 1927, to Briand.
6. From the speech made before the
Tenth Assembly in September, 1929. The original text of the
speech and the French translation in Les Prix Nobel read,
instead of «treaties»: «measuring out doses of
security and applications of the paragraphs of Article 8 of the
covenant».
7. Robert de Traz (1884-1951),
French author.
8. These lines from «The song
of the Bell» by Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller
(1759-1805), German poet and dramatist, have been translated by
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow as follows:
Gentle peace!
Sweet union!
Linger, linger
Kindly over this our home!
...
Peace its first, its latest sound!
From Nobel Lectures, Peace 1926-1950, Editor Frederick W. Haberman, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1972
Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1929